Conjecturing is not all
Theorizing in design research by refining and connecting categorial, descriptive, and explanatory theory element
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.8.1.2120Keywords:
Content-related design research, theorizing, conjectures, theory elements, PD design researchAbstract
Although generating empirically grounded theoretical contributions has been an essential aim of design research from the beginning, the underlying methodology has been described as in need for further elaboration with respect to rigor. Existing methodological elaborations on theorizing in design research often focus on argumentative grammar of strengthening prescriptive conjectures. Beyond these, this paper argues that prescriptive theory elements require generating categorial, descriptive, and explanatory theory elements before the suggested argumentative grammars can be treated. With an example from a design research study for professional development, the immense work of elaborating categorial and explanatory theory elements is illustrated that is needed before concise prescriptive conjectures can be made and tested.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
URN
License
Authors contributing to EDeR agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.