‘The Disease will Come!’ Contingency, Irony, and Challenging Closures in Ethnographic Writing

Authors

  • Rosalie Stolz

Keywords:

Contingency, ethnographic writing, irony, Khmu, Laos, narrative

Abstract

Drawing on a brief ethnographic encounter in north-western Laos, this paper argues that fleeting encounters in the field can bring unforeseen topics and phenomena to the fieldworker’s attention – in this case rumours circulating about an antidote to the impending coronavirus disease. The paper explores the resonances of this rumour with experiences from previous fieldwork and discusses a variety of local reactions, including mockery and self-deprecating gestures. Reflecting on narrative choices in ethnographic writing, the paper argues that the inclusion of contingent encounters in ethnographic writing, how they unfolded in the field and were grounded in sociality, can allow the illumination of how ethnographic knowledge is produced. Finally, this contribution argues that sensitivity to contingency and irony allows for ethnographic writing that challenges epistemic closure.

Downloads

Citations
0
0
0 citations recorded by Crossref

Submission 1667 has no DOI.

0 citations recorded by Semantic Scholar
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    280
  • PDF
    285
Further information

Received

2021-05-05

Published

2021-05-05

How to Cite

Stolz, R. (2021). ‘The Disease will Come!’ Contingency, Irony, and Challenging Closures in Ethnographic Writing. Ethnoscripts, 23(1). Retrieved from https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/ethnoscripts/article/view/1667